![]() |
| photo courtesy of cnet.com |
SPOILER-FREE DISCUSSION
Avengers: Endgame brings the major, overarching narrative threads of the Marvel Cinematic Universe to a close, and with only one movie left in “Phase Three”—July’s Spider-Man: Far From Home—I think we can officially declare the MCU a win. Throughout its eleven years to date, the Marvel Cinematic Universe reached unprecedented critical and commercial success, earning dependably positive reviews from critics and topping Star Wars to become the highest grossing franchise of all time. More broadly, MCU’s ubiquitous presence reshaped the makeup of Hollywood, inspiring a wave of imitators and lookalikes.
Avengers: Endgame brings the major, overarching narrative threads of the Marvel Cinematic Universe to a close, and with only one movie left in “Phase Three”—July’s Spider-Man: Far From Home—I think we can officially declare the MCU a win. Throughout its eleven years to date, the Marvel Cinematic Universe reached unprecedented critical and commercial success, earning dependably positive reviews from critics and topping Star Wars to become the highest grossing franchise of all time. More broadly, MCU’s ubiquitous presence reshaped the makeup of Hollywood, inspiring a wave of imitators and lookalikes.
![]() |
| Iron Man. photo courtesy of pursuenews.com |
The reasons for Marvel
Studio’s success have been the subject of many a think piece, so I’ll do us all
a favor and keep my list short. At the time of this writing, I’d identify these
factors:
1) Excellent casting,
primarily Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man.
2) The proportional
success of Iron Man and The Avengers in the early years.
3) The adoption of the comic
book model of storytelling, wherein individual installments function as
advertisements for later crossovers.
4) Fan service. The
prime example is The Avengers, which,
apart from uniting the titular heroes, also features hero vs. hero fights (Iron
Man vs. Thor vs. Captain America, Hulk vs. Thor, Black Widow vs. Hawkeye).
![]() |
| The Avengers. photo courtesy of beamesonfilm.blogspot.com |
5) A movement toward
diversity in movies from 2017 on.
6) A diversity of tones
from sub-franchise to sub-franchise (Thor
is a vastly different experience compared to Ant-Man, say).
But in the wake of Avengers: Endgame, it’s perhaps more
useful to talk about the effects of
the MCU rather than its causes. The most immediate effect is the franchise’s
box office performance, which is unlikely to be surpassed by another franchise
anytime soon. At the time I’m writing this, Endgame
just obliterated opening weekend records from Star Wars: The Force Awakens and Avengers: Infinity War, and box office analysts are considering
whether it could even topple Avatar’s
$2.7 billion in the top spot. The MCU as a whole now hovers somewhere around
the $20 billion mark.
![]() |
| Captain America: The Winter Soldier. photo courtesy of awn.com |
10 years ago, few could
have forecasted Marvel’s passing Star
Wars on the charts. It would take years of consistent, substantial box
office success—something that rarely occurs in any franchise, big or small—and yet
that’s exactly what happened. Marvel Studios lost money on maybe one out of its 22 films (that being The Incredible Hulk), even when releasing multiple films in the
same year. Let that sink in. Even Star Wars, thought to be guaranteed gold
at the domestic box office, recently suffered its first outright failure with Solo: A Star Wars Story, only the 10th
film in that series.
Even more surprising,
the MCU found box office success no matter the time of year. Since the MCU’s
arrival, the term “summer blockbuster” has become increasingly meaningless as studios,
following the MCU’s example, release major tentpoles in every season. Marvel
Studios itself released films in eight of the twelve months (the exceptions
being January, September, October, and December), each of them taking the #1 spot
at the weekend box office.
![]() |
| Guardians of the Galaxy. photo courtesy of nerdreactor.com |
The post-credits scene
has become synonymous with Marvel. MCU movies didn’t invent the concept, but they
undoubtedly established it more firmly in mainstream consciousness. Before 2008,
only a few blockbusters—including Pirates
of the Caribbean, Pixar films, and Marvel’s competitors at Fox-owned X-Men—featured post-credits scenes. Now,
post-credit scenes are required reading for superhero films and not infrequent in
other genres.
And then there’s the
Marvel model itself: what is now known as a “shared universe.” The MCU was not
the first shared universe in film—that honor belongs to Universal’s classic
monster movies, which debuted in the 1920s—but it popularized the approach.
Nowadays, it seems like every major franchise has attempted or is going to
attempt a shared universe, from DC Comics to Legendary’s MonsterVerse (see Godzilla: King of the Monsters in a
theater near you!). Even Disney-owned Lucasfilm altered its business model to
mirror Marvel, introducing Star Wars spinoffs into the lineup.
![]() |
| Rogue One: A Star Wars Story, the first Star Wars spinoff. photo courtesy of vanityfair.com |
But no one has
replicated Marvel Studios’ model with the same consistency or at the same level
of box office success. Some less fortunate attempts were met with immediate
disaster (Universal’s Dark Universe failed to get off the ground twice), but even the more consistently
profitable ventures (like the Conjuring Universe) post smalltime earnings when
compared to the MCU. And in a larger sense, it’s hard to think of any other
franchise, shared universe or otherwise, that has pulled off anything like 10
years of continuous, interconnected, and reliably profitable storytelling set
within the same universe. Not Star Wars, not James Bond, not Harry Potter, not The Lord
of the Rings, not Fox’s 19-year-running X-Men
franchise.
Of course, there are plenty
of people for whom this kind of achievement amounts to a negative for the industry
as a whole. Tentpole films crowd out other, smaller films and effectively silence
worthwhile voices and stories. (The same accusation was also leveled at Star Wars and Spielberg beginning in the
1970s, when blockbuster films began to eclipse more sophisticated cinema.) Now
there are new factors, like streaming services, that influence the cinema landscape
perhaps more forcefully.
![]() |
| Black Panther. photo courtesy of wsj.com |
Other commentators are
better equipped to determine whether Marvel and similar blockbusters’ triumph equates
to the downfall of more meaningful cinema, but for what it’s worth, the MCU’s films
are not entirely homogenous or uncreative; they display a degree of diversity within
themselves. As superhero blockbusters crowd out the market, studios need to be
more competitive and inventive. A movie that worked in 2010 won’t necessarily fly
in 2019. So as much as Marvel has proliferated the presence of superhero films,
they have also been a driving force behind evolving the genre, inviting new
outlooks to the table, sponsoring creators, and exploring new tones.
A movie like Iron Man
4, for instance, might have had immediate box office potential, but instead Marvel
Studios took relative creative risks with titles like Guardians of the Galaxy, Ant-Man,
Thor: Ragnarok, and Black Panther. Those movies didn’t need
to exist, and it’s hard to imagine movies like them getting the big-budget
treatment without an established brand like Marvel greenlighting them. (Of
course, even Iron Man was a risk at
the time).
![]() |
| Venom. photo courtesy of thrillist.com |
And other studios took
notice. Fox’s Deadpool obviously made
quite a splash, but you only need to consider Sony’s Venom, a bad movie that found box office success because it was brazen
and weird, to see how Marvel’s experiments with tone have impacted the
industry. As much as commentators forecast an impending spell of “superhero
fatigue,” it has yet to materialize, at least in part because of the MCU’s willingness
to evolve alongside its audience.
Later years will shed
more insight on the MCU’s legacy, both positive and negative. In the meantime, now
that Avengers: Endgame brought the
MCU’s “Infinity Saga” to a close without any major hiccups, the only remaining question
is how long Marvel Studios can keep its historic hot streak alive.
MCU HIGHLIGHTS
The Best Periods in the MCU:
1) July 2017-2018, Spider-Man: Homecoming through Avengers: Infinity War, was a series of
consistently top-notch films.
2) 2014, which saw the
release of Captain America: The Winter
Soldier and Guardians of the Galaxy,
two of the most highly regarded MCU movies.
The Worst Period in the MCU:
June 2008-2010, The Incredible Hulk and Iron Man 2. These two are rightfully considered
some of the weakest MCU movies.
MCU Milestones:
-Iron Man (2008) came out when the superhero genre was dominated by
Nolan’s Batman. Its fresh tone and RDJ’s performance gave the MCU its kickstart.
-The Incredible Hulk (2008). Though it shares some of the later MCU’s
hallmarks, this one feels like the last of another type of superhero movie—the dark,
pulpier, action-heavy Fox superhero movies like Daredevil (2003) and Ghost
Rider (2007).
-The Avengers (2012) proved the viability of the shared universe
model and catapulted the MCU into another level of box office success and pop
culture consciousness.
-Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) and Captain America: Civil War (2016) proved the MCU’s commitment to a
truly “shared” universe; at least in theory, the events of one movie have
consequences that permeate all the others.
-Guardians of the Galaxy (2014). At the time, it represented Marvel’s
boldest tonal shift and greatest creative risk.
-Black Panther (2018) was a milestone for not just the MCU but for
all of Hollywood— a landmark film for representation and an unmistakable pop
culture phenomenon.
-Avengers: Endgame (2019) is notable for intentionally bringing the “Infinity
Saga” to a close and for its explosive box office performance.












No comments:
Post a Comment