![]() |
| photo courtesy of bladerunnermovie.com |
SPOILER-FREE REVIEW
Blade Runner 2049 is the
sequel to 1982’s sci-fi cult classic, Blade
Runner. Blade Runner famously did
not receive many accolades (or much box office success) at the time of release,
but has since been widely recognized by critics as a masterpiece for its highly
influential, neo-noir science fiction atmosphere, its state of the art effects,
and its complex philosophical undertones. While Blade Runner 2049 is another animal altogether, it too is a sci fi
masterpiece for our time…and it too might struggle to find appreciation among
mainstream viewers.
2049 follows K (Ryan Gosling), who
is both a replicant (a highly advanced, synthetic android nearly
indistinguishable from a human) and a Blade Runner (agent sent to hunt down and
“retire” malfunctioning, violent replicants). On a routine mission to retire a
rogue replicant, K uncovers a well-kept secret. With his newfound knowledge in
hand, K sets off on an investigation that leads him to the doorstep of exiled
ex-Blade Runner, Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford).
![]() |
| photo courtesy of nerdist.com |
Like its predecessor, 2049 is a contemplative, brooding film
that infuses its dystopian sci fi set pieces with ruminations on sexuality,
technology, humanity, and several other interrelated themes. 2049 doesn’t manage these themes quite
as deftly or as effortlessly as the original Blade Runner, and it deviates from the feeling and tone of the
original in several important ways (which I’ll discuss below). But that doesn’t
stop 2049 from reaching intriguing heights in its own right; a mixture of
electric performances, stunning imagery, compelling mystery, and weighty moral
questions make Blade Runner 2049 a visual
and intellectual delight.
Having said this, it’s worth noting
that 2049 probably won’t appeal to
everyone. There are several reasons: it’s incredibly long (2 hours and 44
minutes!), it moves at a slow but deliberate pace, it presents a primarily dark
view of the future, it grapples with heavy themes, and it includes a fair
amount of nudity. Those factors will obviously deter a great many audience
members, and that’s fine. But if you can stomach them, I think you’ll find that
Blade Runner 2049 is well worth the
temporal and emotional investment.
![]() |
| photo courtesy of slashfilm.com |
Before I move on to the spoiler section
of this review, I’ll address a question many potential audience members will
want to know: do I need to see the original? I think people will have different
answers to that question, but my answer is no, you don’t need to see the original. That is, the plot will be follow-able and
the movie can stand on its own two feet in terms of philosophical content.
However, much like the Star Wars
franchise, the experience of seeing the new installment is enriched by
knowledge of the old. So if you want to feel like you can fully appreciate Blade Runner
2049, I’d recommend catching up on the original beforehand. Better, not
necessary.
BEWARE: HERE THERE BE SPOILERS—FOR BOTH BLADE RUNNER AND BLADE
RUNNER 2049
![]() |
| photo courtesy of vox.com |
Blade Runner 2049 is in a
tricky spot just by nature of its existence. As a sequel to a beloved property,
it bears the weight of high expectations, but there are also questions about
necessity. Why does it exist at all? If it does exist, how should a
35-years-coming sequel approach the legacy of the original? 2049 navigates that tricky situation
with a lot of smart decisions. Blade
Runner left audiences with a distinct vision of the future and plenty of
questions, and 2049 respects those
boundaries while expanding the world where necessary. An inferior sequel might exploit
every detail or hint from the original, but here the filmmakers are smart
enough to let the mysterious remain mysterious, only illuminating new
information where it serves the character-driven story. This means that the
film doesn’t come across as particularly plot-driven (even though it is the
mystery of Rachael’s child that propels the action), taking time to slowly
develop characters and themes for a richer payoff.
One temptation in a sequel to a popular
film is to raise the stakes beyond what makes sense, and that’s one area where 2049 does well. The obvious thing would
be to take Blade Runner’s very
personal story about Deckard and make the sequel about, say, Deckard’s son. A
premise like that carries built-in emotional stakes, and it’s easy to see how it
might quickly evolve into a story with an epic, worldwide scope.
![]() |
| photo courtesy of digitalspy.com |
And 2049
certainly does escalate the action, moving from the periphery to the halls of
power and packing in a good deal more plot. But it actively resists doing the
obvious thing, choosing instead to stay grounded. K isn’t Deckard’s son or the
“chosen one” for the replicant rebellion, he’s just another poor “Joe” (like
Deckard) getting tossed around by forces bigger than himself. Blade Runner 2049 resists the temptation
to make its story about the exceptional, and that’s a testament to the maturity
of its storytelling. Lucasfilm take notice.
In terms of theme, 2049 revisits many of the same issues raised by its predecessor. But
it doesn’t feel like a rehash; the movie reframes and then expands its thematic
conceits in interesting ways. Take, for instance, the question of what
constitutes humanity, posed in Blade
Runner by the nebulous boundary between genuine humans and artificial
replicants—and their common mortality. 2049
pushes the question further; Rachael’s child makes the boundary between human
and replicant moot, and K’s death in service to a greater cause makes him more
human than many of the human characters.
![]() |
| photo courtesy of vox.com |
Another prominent theme is the
(mis)treatment of women. Blade Runner
provided a commentary on sexual exploitation, depicting its futuristic women as
(sometimes literal) objects for men’s sexual desire or violence. Blade Runner 2049 extends that narrative
with 1) Joi’s (Ana de Armas) immaterial presence, which makes her even more
disposable than replicants, and 2) a great deal of on-screen violence against
women. Even the women in positions of relative power (Robin Wright’s Lieutenant
Joshi and Sylvia Hoeks’ Luv) inflict violence on one another in pursuit of
their goals.
It should be noted, however, that while
Blade Runner 2049 does an admirable
job of exploring themes like these, it can’t replicate (get it?) the ease with
which Blade Runner does the same.
What Blade Runner says with an
ellipsis, as a natural by-product of its storytelling, 2049 says with an exclamation point, in an effort to include the
necessary philosophical quotient for a Blade
Runner sequel. You can tell it’s trying.
In terms of plot, 2049 is pretty straightforward: K investigates the mystery of
Rachael’s child, following leads and entertaining theories, yada yada. The
slower pace, as I’ve already said, might deter some viewers, but I think the
plot is interesting enough to maintain interest. The script only really runs
into problems toward the end, where the weight of the plot forcibly—and very
noticeably—kicks the story into gear.
![]() |
| photo courtesy of birthmoviesdeath.com |
If there were any doubt, Blade Runner 2049 is a sensory wonder. It
is simply beautiful to look at, even when the screen is filled with aggressive,
dystopian skyscrapers. Seriously, this is one of the most visually striking
films I’ve seen in a while. What’s more, it boasts different settings with
unique color palettes—both the foggy grey farm at the film’s beginning, the
dusty orange remnants of Las Vegas, the seedy underbelly of street-level LA. Interestingly, though the shots of
exterior LA are just as smog-cloaked as in Blade
Runner, 2049 otherwise ditches
the neo-noir aesthetic that marked the original’s cinematography, trading it in
for unfeeling, fluorescent interiors. 2049
also loses something of the quirky, bizarre visuals that contributed to the
original’s unusual atmosphere. Although there are plenty of engaging imagery
surrounding 2049’s villains, there’s
nothing quite so oddball as Rutger Hauer’s Roy Batty or Daryl Hannah’s
dark-eyed Pris.
Legendary composer Hanz Zimmer and Benjamin Wallfisch unite to score the movie, and as expected, they do a great job. For the most part they emulate Vangelis' haunting score to the original film, though Zimmer's trademark throbbing bass is prominent. 80s-style synth soundtracks seem to be making a comeback alongside the nostalgia trend, and that sound drives the music here.
![]() |
| photo courtesy of collider.com |
One of the film’s greatest
accomplishments is its CGI, which is impeccable. Everything from sweeping landscapes
to everyday sci-fi gadgets are artfully rendered, lending the film a sense of
realism that helps the audience buy into the action. No trick is more
impressive than the digital recreation of Sean Young (Rachael in Blade Runner) in one scene, engineered
through use of CGI and a stand-in actress. Digital recreation or de-aging is
becoming more popular, showing up in everything from Star Wars to Kingsman,
but Blade Runner 2049’s Rachael is by
far the most believable on screen so far. The filmmakers achieve this, in part,
by keeping her lines and movement to a minimum, but they nevertheless trust the
digital wizardry to be the focus of the entire frame for a few beats. It’s an
impressive achievement that serves the story in a meaningful way.
Blade Runner 2049 also
benefits from a stellar cast. Ryan Gosling, Ana de Armas, Sylvia Hoeks, Robin
Wright, and Mackenzie Davis all provide exceptional performances. Jared Leto
plays the shadowy villain, Wallace, and although I typically think Leto’s
overrated, he’s right for the role. His performance might be a bit on the nose,
but he’s creepy enough to keep his scenes from getting too farfetched. Finally,
Harrison Ford returns as Deckard. We get a few scenes of “sassy Harrison,”
which appears to be the character he plays in most of his recent reboots, but
there are also a few scenes (for instance, his interaction with Leto’s Wallace)
where Harrison absolutely knocks it out of the park. An actor of his caliber
could easily just mail it in at this point, but the fact that he really shows
up helps make 2049 something special.
Watch the trailer here.
Watch the trailer here.
![]() |
| photo courtesy of collider.com |









No comments:
Post a Comment