Wednesday, August 9, 2017

Detroit

photo courtesy of teaser-trailer.com
WARNING: HERE THERE BE SPOILERS (but it’s also based on history, so get over it)

     From Annapurna Pictures and Academy-Award winning director Kathryn Bigelow comes Detroit, a semi-historical crime drama. The film takes place during the 1967 riots, but it centers on the Algiers Motel Incident, in which a group of young black men (and two white women) were detained and brutally interrogated by Detroit police officers and three black men were shot. Detroit features Star Wars hero John Boyega as Melvin Dismukes, Will Poulter as Philip Krauss, Algee Smith as Larry Reed, and a host of actors in other roles—notably John Krasinski as Attorney Auerbach and Malcom David Kelley (WAAAAAAALT from Lost) as Michael Clark.

     Detroit courts a certain degree of controversy, altering the historical subject matter with a series of insertions and omissions. Because the officers were never officially convicted for the murder of the three black men, the film skirts around the point, providing several stand-in officers with changed names (plus one original police character) and presenting security guard Dismukes in an entirely sympathetic light. Those choices open the movie up to charges of shifting blame from guilty officers.
photo courtesy of theatlantic.com
     On the other hand, the movie also lays the blame for the deaths squarely at white officers’ feet—not only the officers who pulled the trigger, but many others who looked the other way—paving the way for charges from the other direction. On top of that, the movie has received justifiable criticism for failing to satisfactorily explore black life, motivations for the riots, or the subsequent Citywide Citizen’s Action Committee tribunal. All this to say… Detroit invites quite a bit of argument from quite a few sources.

     Controversy aside, Detroit displays both compelling storytelling and excellent craftsmanship. Bigelow impresses in the director’s chair, capturing the sense of chaos and claustrophobia that permeates the setting. The early riot scenes are particularly effective, relaying Detroit’s descent into violence in a series of quick sequences. Bigelow relies on frantic, handheld shots and fast cuts to convey the frenzy of the riots, but for the most part close-ups dominate the frame, reflecting the in-your-face, invasive interrogation techniques employed by the officers. The movie also includes an artsy, painted prologue sequence.
photo courtesy of ew.com
     From a storytelling standpoint, I think Detroit has its weaknesses. It feels too journalistic, too distant from its characters for most of the film. The visual, visceral nature of the injustice takes center stage, so the filmmakers spend less time giving the audience a specific point of view through which to interpret the events.

     Two characters are given the most attention—Boyega’s Dismukes and Smith’s Larry Reed—but the movie shifts between them at pivotal moments, making it unclear which character is intended to be at the forefront. The ending, which sees Reed finally get a job at a local church, seems to imply that it has been his story all along, but the movie’s split focus has not made that clear up to that point. Even so, Smith’s acting and the construction of the sequence are solid enough to bring the film to a strong close.  

     FINAL VERDICT: Detroit provides a gripping—if not uncomplicated—viewpoint into a piece of American history.
photo courtesy of imdb.com

No comments:

Post a Comment